back

When someone copies your brand name, logo, or trade dress, your instinct is to take legal action. But the legal route you choose depends on whether your trademark is registered. This is where the distinction between passing off vs trademark infringement becomes critical. Both concepts protect brand identity, yet they operate under different legal frameworks, require different types of evidence, and offer different remedies.

Many business owners use these terms interchangeably, which creates confusion when they actually need to enforce their rights. Understanding the difference passing off infringement carries isn't just an academic exercise. It determines your litigation strategy, the burden of proof you carry, and the strength of protection your brand enjoys. This guide breaks down both concepts in the Indian legal context, compares them side by side, and explains when each applies to your situation.

What is Trademark Infringement?

Trademark infringement is a statutory right available exclusively to owners of registered trademarks. It is defined under Sections 29 and 30 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. When someone uses a mark that is identical or deceptively similar to your registered trademark in relation to goods or services covered by your registration, it constitutes infringement.

The law presumes that a registered trademark is valid and that the owner has exclusive rights over it. This presumption significantly reduces the burden of proof in an infringement action. You don't need to prove that your mark has acquired goodwill or reputation in the marketplace. The registration certificate itself serves as prima facie evidence of your ownership and the validity of the mark.

For instance, if you hold a registered trademark for a clothing brand and a competitor starts selling garments under an identical name in the same class, you can initiate infringement proceedings directly. The court examines whether the accused mark is likely to cause confusion among consumers. If the marks are identical and the goods are the same, confusion is presumed. For similar but non-identical marks, the court applies a detailed comparison of visual, phonetic, and conceptual elements.

Securing your mark through formal trademark registration is the most reliable way to access infringement remedies and establish your rights without needing extensive evidence of market presence.

What is Passing Off?

Passing off is a common law remedy that protects unregistered trademarks and trade names. It doesn't require registration. Instead, it relies on the goodwill and reputation a brand has built through actual use in the marketplace. The principle behind passing off is straightforward. No person has the right to represent their goods or services as those of another.

In India, passing off actions are typically filed in civil courts under the broader framework of tort law. The Trade Marks Act, 1999 itself recognises passing off rights under Section 27(2), which preserves the right of any person to take action against another for passing off goods or services as those of another person. This means even without a registration certificate, you can seek legal protection, provided you can demonstrate the required elements.

The classic test for passing off was established in the Reckitt and Colman case, which requires the claimant to prove three essential elements, often called the "classical trinity." First, goodwill or reputation attached to the goods or services in the mind of the purchasing public. Second, misrepresentation by the defendant leading or likely to lead the public into believing that the goods or services offered are those of the claimant. Third, actual or potential damage to the claimant's goodwill or business as a result of the misrepresentation.

Passing Off vs Trademark Infringement: Detailed Comparison

ParameterTrademark InfringementPassing Off
Legal BasisStatutory right under Trade Marks Act, 1999Common law right based on tort principles
Registration RequiredYes, only registered marks qualifyNo, protects unregistered marks
Burden of ProofLower. Registration serves as prima facie evidenceHigher. Must prove goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage
Scope of ProtectionEntire territory of IndiaLimited to geographic area where goodwill exists
Key EvidenceRegistration certificate and proof of useSales figures, advertising spend, customer testimonials, market surveys
Who Can FileRegistered proprietor or authorised userAny person with established goodwill
Defendant's IntentNot required to prove. Likelihood of confusion sufficesFraudulent intent strengthens the case but isn't mandatory
Remedies AvailableInjunction, damages, account of profits, delivery upInjunction, damages, account of profits
Governed BySections 29 and 30 of the Trade Marks ActSection 27(2) of the Act and common law

 

The comparison table highlights a fundamental difference passing off infringement actions carry. Infringement is easier to prove because registration provides a legal presumption of validity. Passing off demands substantially more evidence because you must independently establish that your mark has earned recognition and goodwill in the relevant market.

When Does Each Remedy Apply?

Choose Infringement When

An infringement suit is the preferred route when you hold a valid registration for the mark in question. The registration gives you a clear statutory right, and the legal proceedings are comparatively straightforward. Courts can grant interim injunctions more readily because the registration certificate provides immediate evidence of your exclusive right.

Infringement actions are particularly effective when the accused mark is identical to yours and operates in the same class of goods or services. In such cases, the court doesn't even require proof of actual confusion. The identity of the marks and the goods creates an automatic presumption of consumer confusion.

Choose Passing Off When

Passing off becomes your primary remedy when your mark isn't registered but has acquired significant goodwill through continuous use. This is common for businesses that started trading under a brand name long before formal registration was pursued, or for marks that are currently in the registration pipeline.

Passing off is also relevant when the dispute involves trade dress, packaging, or get-up that goes beyond a word mark or logo. If a competitor copies the overall look and feel of your product, including colour schemes, packaging layout, and product shape, a passing off action addresses these broader elements that might not be fully covered by a trademark registration for a specific word or logo mark.

Filing Both Simultaneously

In practice, many brand owners file suits combining both infringement and passing off claims. This dual approach covers all bases. The infringement claim relies on the statutory right, while the passing off claim addresses any aspects of brand identity that fall outside the registered mark's scope. Courts in India regularly entertain combined suits, and this strategy maximises the chances of obtaining a favourable injunction.

If you're dealing with brand misuse and haven't yet explored formal protection, starting with trademark registration strengthens your future enforcement options considerably. While passing off provides a safety net, registration remains the gold standard for brand protection in India.

Remedies and Relief Available

Both infringement and passing off actions offer a range of remedies. The most sought-after remedy is an interim injunction, which restrains the defendant from using the disputed mark while the case is being heard. Courts grant interim injunctions based on three criteria. First, a prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff. Second, irreparable harm if the injunction isn't granted. Third, the balance of convenience favouring the plaintiff.

Permanent injunctions are granted at the conclusion of the trial and permanently restrain the defendant from using the infringing or passing off mark. Damages compensate the plaintiff for losses suffered due to the defendant's actions. Alternatively, the court may order an account of profits, requiring the defendant to surrender the profits earned through the wrongful use of the mark.

In infringement cases, courts can additionally order the delivery up or destruction of infringing goods, labels, and materials. This remedy ensures that the offending products are physically removed from the market. For businesses facing active brand threats, timely action through a trademark notice often resolves the issue before litigation becomes necessary.

Proving Your Case: Evidence That Matters

In an infringement suit, the registration certificate is your strongest asset. Beyond that, evidence of commercial use, such as invoices, product photographs, marketing materials, and website analytics, demonstrates that the mark is actively in use and that the infringement is causing real harm in the marketplace.

For passing off, the evidentiary requirements are more demanding. You need to build a compelling narrative of goodwill through sales data spanning multiple years, advertising expenditure records, media coverage, customer testimonials, and market survey reports. The strength of your evidence directly determines the strength of your case. Courts look for consistent, long-standing use that establishes the mark's association with your business in the consumer's mind.

In both scenarios, evidence of actual consumer confusion carries significant weight. Screenshots of social media complaints where consumers mistook the defendant's product for yours, customer emails expressing confusion, and instances of misdirected orders all serve as powerful proof of the harm caused by the defendant's actions.

Protecting Your Brand: Prevention is Better Than Litigation

Litigation is expensive and time-consuming. The best strategy is to minimise the risk of disputes before they arise. Register your trademark at the earliest opportunity. This single step transforms your brand protection from the weaker passing off framework to the stronger statutory infringement framework.

Monitor the Trademark Journal regularly for marks that are confusingly similar to yours and file trademark opposition proceedings promptly to prevent competitors from gaining registered rights over similar marks. Set up Google Alerts and marketplace monitoring tools to detect unauthorised use of your brand name online.

Maintain thorough records of your brand's commercial use from day one. Invoices, advertising receipts, photographs of products, and customer correspondence create a paper trail that supports both infringement and passing off claims. Businesses that manage their intellectual property proactively alongside other compliance obligations such as trademark renewal deadlines and private limited company registration annual filings find themselves far better positioned when disputes arise.

Conclusion

The distinction between passing off vs trademark infringement is not merely theoretical. It shapes your litigation strategy, determines the evidence you need, and defines the scope of protection your brand receives. Infringement provides a faster, stronger remedy for registered marks, while passing off offers a vital safety net for brands that have built goodwill without formal registration.

The smartest approach combines both. Register your trademark to access statutory protection, maintain thorough records of commercial use to support passing off claims, and monitor the market actively to catch threats early. If you're facing brand misuse or need guidance on protecting your intellectual property, Patron Accounting's trademark professionals can help you choose the right legal strategy and take decisive action to safeguard your brand.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Have a look at the answers to the most asked questions.

Trademark infringement requires a registered mark and is a statutory remedy under the Trade Marks Act. Passing off protects unregistered marks through common law and requires proof of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage.

Yes. Indian courts regularly hear combined suits where the plaintiff claims both infringement of a registered mark and passing off based on accumulated goodwill. This dual approach provides the broadest protection.

Registration isn't mandatory, as passing off provides a remedy for unregistered marks. However, registration significantly strengthens your legal position by reducing the burden of proof and granting nationwide statutory rights.

You need evidence proving goodwill (sales data, advertising spend, market presence), misrepresentation by the defendant (similar mark or trade dress causing confusion), and actual or potential damage to your business or reputation.

Timelines vary depending on the court and complexity. Interim injunctions can be obtained within weeks of filing. Full trial proceedings typically take 2 to 5 years, though many cases settle after the injunction stage.

Table of content

Loading content...

Subscribe to get updates from Patron Accounting

Share this article

Register your Pvt. Ltd

Company with us.

India Flag +91
Get updates on WhatsApp WhatsApp

More articles on the go.

Play Icon

Bring back the joy of reading newsletters & blogs

Subscribe and be ready for an amazing experience

Back to Top